|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Portfolio
(Group) |
Our portfolio to the town council provides clear and convincing evidence for our choice of design, accurate and detailed blueprints of our model bridge, and other supporting documentation including a concept web, graphs, charts, and photos. |
Our portfolio to the town council provides evidence for our choice of design, accurate blueprints of our model bridge, and some supporting documentation such as a concept web, graphs, charts, and photos. |
Our portfolio to the town council provides minimal evidence for our choice of design, blueprints of our model bridge with errors, and one other supporting document: either, a concept web, graph, chart, or photo. |
Our portfolio to the town council does not provide evidence for our choice of design, accurate blueprints of our model bridge, or other supporting documents. |
| Content |
Our presentation and portfolio cover all elements relating to the bridge design in depth with details and examples. Our subject knowledge is excellent. |
Our presentation and portfolio include essential knowledge about the bridge design. Our subject knowledge appears to be good. |
Our presentation and portfolio include essential information about the bridge design but there are 1-2 factual errors. |
The content in our presentation and portfolio is minimal OR there are several factual errors. |
Understanding
(Individual) |
I effectively demonstrate a thorough understanding of the importance of geometry in the modern world by providing an insightful explanation with many detailed examples drawn from my work in the unit. |
I accurately provide details about the importance of geometry in the modern world. |
I provide a few examples about the importance of geometry in the modern world. |
I demonstrate severe misconceptions about the importance of geometry in the modern world. |
Organization
of
Presentation |
My content is well organized using headings and subheadings effectively to convey relationships among ideas. My bullets summarize my main points. |
My content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. |
My content is logically organized for the most part. |
I do not use a clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. |
| Persuasiveness |
My key points are detailed and clear with excellent visuals to support details. I completely persuade the audience to agree or side with my proposal. |
My key points are clear but lack detail. My visuals support my points. I am able to persuade most of the audience to agree or side with my proposal. |
My key points are a little difficult to understand, but I have included critical components. It is hard to see the connection between my visuals and the key points. The audience is somewhat persuaded but has lots of questions. |
My explanation is difficult to understand and is missing several components OR is not included. My visuals do not relate. The audience is not persuaded to agree or side with me. |
| Presentation |
My presentation is well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds the audiences attention – slides are constantly referred to and enhance the presentation. |
My presentation is rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audiences attention most of the time – slides are often referred to and enhance presentation. |
My delivery is not smooth, but I am able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time – slides are rarely referred to. |
My delivery is not smooth and I often lose the audiences attention –slides are not referred to at all. |
|
Check:
- Blueprint
- Bridge
- PowerPoint
|
Content and Understanding
(Double weighted)
8 6 4 2 |
Presentation, Persuasiveness, and Organization
(Single weighted)
4 3 2 1 |
Overall
/28 |
|