View as Microsoft Word* | View as PDF
Project Rubric
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Reasoning and Proof |
- Conjecture follows a logical mathematical argument.
- Deductive arguments are used to justify decisions.
- Accurate, credible evidence is used to justify and support decisions made and conclusions reached.
- Testing and accepting or rejecting of conjecture is shown with well-thought-out rationale for decision.
- Generalization is made to other cases.
|
- Arguments are constructed with adequate mathematical basis.
- A systematic approach and/or justification of correct reasoning is present.
- Patterns are explained.
- Testing and accepting or rejecting of conjecture is shown.
|
- Arguments are made with some mathematical basis.
- Some correct reasoning or justification for reasoning is present with trial and error, or by unsystematically trying several cases.
|
- Arguments are made with no mathematical basis.
- Neither correct reasoning nor justification for reasoning is present.
|
| Mathematical Communication |
- A strong sense of audience and purpose is communicated.
- Arguments are supported by mathematical properties used.
- Precise math language and symbolic notation are used to communicate ideas.
|
- A sense of audience or purpose is communicated.
- Communication of an approach is evident through a methodical, organized, coherent, sequenced, and labeled response.
- Formal math language is used throughout the solution to share and clarify ideas.
|
- Some awareness of audience or purpose is communicated.
- Some communication of an approach is evident through explanations.
- Some formal math language is used, and examples are provided to communicate ideas.
|
- No awareness of audience or purpose is communicated.
- Little or no communication of an approach is evident.
- Everyday, familiar language is used to communicate ideas.
. |
| Presentation |
- The presentation is highly effective.
- The ideas are presented in an engaging, polished, clear, and thorough manner and are mindful of audience, context, and purpose.
- The use of the presentation tool enhances the communication of the content.
|
- The presentation is effective.
- The ideas are presented in a clear and thorough manner, showing awareness of the audience, context, and purpose.
- The use of the presentation tool supports the communication of the content.
|
- The presentation is somewhat effective.
- Some problems with clarity, thoroughness, delivery, and polish are evident.
- The ideas are presented in a way that is unclear whether the audience, context, and purpose are considered.
- The use of the presentation tool does not support the communication of the content.
|
- The presentation is ineffective.
- The presentation is unpolished, providing little evidence of planning, practice, and consideration of purpose and audience.
- The use of the presentation tool interferes with the communication of the content.
|
Some content adapted from: www.exemplars.com/resources/rubrics/nctm.html*
< Return to Assessment Plan
< Return to Examining Change