< Return to Examining Change
Showing Evidence Tool: Examining Change
Assessing Understanding

View as Microsoft Word* | View as PDF

Project Rubric

4 3 2 1
Reasoning and Proof
  • Conjecture follows a logical mathematical argument.
  • Deductive arguments are used to justify decisions. 
  • Accurate, credible evidence is used to justify and support decisions made and conclusions reached. 
  • Testing and accepting or rejecting of conjecture is shown with well-thought-out rationale for decision.
  • Generalization is made to other cases.
  • Arguments are constructed with adequate mathematical basis. 
  • A systematic approach and/or justification of correct reasoning is present.
  • Patterns are explained.
  • Testing and accepting or rejecting of conjecture is shown.
  • Arguments are made with some mathematical basis.
  • Some correct reasoning or justification for reasoning is present with trial and error, or by unsystematically trying several cases. 
  • Arguments are made with no mathematical basis. 
  • Neither correct reasoning nor justification for reasoning is present.
Mathematical Communication
  • A strong sense of audience and purpose is communicated.
  • Arguments are supported by mathematical properties used. 
  • Precise math language and symbolic notation are used to communicate ideas.
  • A sense of audience or purpose is communicated. 
  • Communication of an approach is evident through a methodical, organized, coherent, sequenced, and labeled response. 
  • Formal math language is used throughout the solution to share and clarify ideas.
  • Some awareness of audience or purpose is communicated. 
  • Some communication of an approach is evident through explanations.
  • Some formal math language is used, and examples are provided to communicate ideas.
  • No awareness of audience or purpose is communicated.
  • Little or no communication of an approach is evident. 
  • Everyday, familiar language is used to communicate ideas.
.
Presentation
  • The presentation is highly effective. 
  • The ideas are presented in an engaging, polished, clear, and thorough manner and are mindful of audience, context, and purpose. 
  • The use of the presentation tool enhances the communication of the content.
  • The presentation is effective. 
  • The ideas are presented in a clear and thorough manner, showing awareness of the audience, context, and purpose. 
  • The use of the presentation tool supports the communication of the content.
  • The presentation is somewhat effective. 
  • Some problems with clarity, thoroughness, delivery, and polish are evident. 
  • The ideas are presented in a way that is unclear whether the audience, context, and purpose are considered.
  • The use of the presentation tool does not support the communication of the content.
  • The presentation is ineffective. 
  • The presentation is unpolished, providing little evidence of planning, practice, and consideration of purpose and audience. 
  • The use of the presentation tool interferes with the communication of the content.

Some content adapted from: www.exemplars.com/resources/rubrics/nctm.html*

< Return to Assessment Plan

< Return to Examining Change



Contact Education ›


Terms of Use, *Trademarks and Privacy ©Intel Corporation