Community Decisions Presentation Rubric
Name ____________________________
| |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Content
-
Community problem identified
-
Community needs assessment results analyzed and explained
-
Ideas ranked with top three including thorough explanation of decision-making process
-
Rankings compared with other constituent groups
-
Recommendations include explanations of top three choices
-
One final recommendation presented with justification
|
Community problem is explained thoroughly.
Needs assessment results are carefully synthesized and interpreted to determine three reasonable and practical choices that accurately reflect the most important needs and values of the constituency group.
Three choices are clearly ranked and each choice is supported by several carefully considered reasons that show how it benefits both the community and the constituency group.
Comparisons with other groups’ rankings draw thoughtful conclusions through careful analysis of similarities and differences of different constituencies.
Final recommendation benefits both the constituency group and the community and is supported by specific references to analyzed survey results and supported with logical, thoughtful reasons. |
Community problem is explained.
Needs assessment results are synthesized to choose three options that fairly reflect the needs and values of the constituency group.
Three choices are clearly ranked and each choice is supported and explains the reasonable and logical benefits for the constituency group.
Comparisons with other groups’ ranking accurately describe the similarities and differences of the groups.
Final recommendation benefits both the constituency group and the community and is less supported by specific references to survey results and is somewhat supported with logical, thoughtful reasons. |
Community problem is explained vaguely.
Three options are presented that may not truly reflect the values of the constituency group and are described vaguely.
Three choices are ranked, but the benefits are superficial or illogical.
Comparisons with other groups’ rankings are superficial and incomplete, with no analysis.
Final recommendation benefits either the constituency group or the community and is not supported adequately by specific references to survey results. |
Community problem is not explained.
Three reasonable options are not described.
Choices are not ranked.
Benefits are not described.
Rankings are not compared.
Final recommendation is not supported. |
|
Presentation
-
Organization
-
Visual elements
-
Mechanics
-
Public speaking
|
Presentation is organized in a logical manner and is engaging.
Graphics enhance the meaning of the presentation.
There are no spelling or punctuation errors.
Speakers consistently use effective public speaking skills and project poise, confidence, and enthusiasm, and organization. |
Presentation is organized in a logical manner.
Graphics contribute to the effectiveness of the presentation.
There are no spelling or punctuation errors that detract from meaning.
Speakers use effective public speaking skills. |
Presentation appears unorganized.
Graphics occasionally distract from the meaning of the presentation.
There are a few spelling and punctuation errors that detract from meaning.
Speakers attempt to use effective public speaking skills. |
Presentation is unorganized and confusing.
Graphics distract from the meaning of the presentation.
There are numerous distracting errors.
Speakers use ineffective public speaking skills. |
|
Teamwork
|
Responsibilities are divided fairly and equitably taking advantage of individual strengths.
Group supports each other and works together effectively, solving problems on their own and making decisions based on reason. |
Responsibilities are divided fairly.
Group members work well together and generally solve problems on their own. |
Work load is extremely uneven.
Group members have frequent disputes and have difficulty resolving them on their own. |
Some group members do not participate or some group members dominate.
Group is unable to complete tasks because of unresolved inter-personal conflicts. |
< Return to Assessment Plan
< Return to Community Decisions